Introduction
Infectious illnesses are the third most common
reason for death globally, according to the World
Health Organization (WHO). Emerging world
pandemics pose a significant risk to humans and
society. COVID-19 is currently considered to
be a pandemic. It is extremely dangerous to a
person’s life and health because it rapidly spreads
from person to person. It can sometimes be fatal,
especially in dangerous situations, as well as the
lack of treatment options. The coronavirus disease
2019 generates varying degrees of emotional
distress due to its widespread impact on the general public’s mental health [1].
On Feb 24, 2020, in Iraq, the first case of the
coronavirus disease 2019 was recorded and was an
Iraqi visitor from Iran. COVID-19 infections were
confirmed in 4469 people on May 24, 2020, with
160 deaths and 2738 people cured of the disease.
Authorities have used important public health
tactics to confront and control the outbreak across
the country. The number of instances continues to
rise rapidly [2].
Nurses suffered a lot on the psychological side
during the Coronavirus period due to their close contact with patients infected with the virus, the
pressured work environment, and the burdens of
confronting the virus. As a result, many nursing
staff suffered from depression, fear and anxiety.
Studies in many countries prove this. Including
a study conducted in China on 4,692 nurses in
hospitals during the Coronavirus period to assess
their psychological state, as it showed a general
weakness in the psychological status of nurses
on the front lines, 9.4% of whom were suffering
from depression and 6.5 had suicidal thoughts,
and 8.1 had anxiety [3]. In a study conducted in
the US, about a third of 684 nurses had symptoms
of anxiety and depression; symptoms of mood
disorders were particularly prominent in nurses.
Infected nurses by COVID-19 have had more
roles in symptoms of anxiety and depression
than in dealing with coronavirus patients. Factors
that played a role in the decline in both anxiety
and depression included the proper use and
accessibility of personal protective equipment as
well as the presence of adequate, unstressed coworkers
as well as family support [4].
Evidence-based information is critical for
healthcare providers and the government to
plan for pandemics like the coronavirus disease
2019. Furthermore, future organizational and
governmental efforts are needed to address the
pandemic’s associated issues and improve the
mental condition of front-line nurses [5]. So it is
critical that governments systematically identify
groups that are at risk of experiencing major
symptoms of depression, anxiety, and also stress,
such as nursing staff, and provide early assistance.
Educating non-psychiatric health workers
regarding mental health assessment will help
ensure quick diagnosis [6].
Understanding the mental health problems
experienced by nurses, especially those working
in high-risk environments such as centers for
COVID-19 patients is crucial for providing
appropriate support and developing targeted
interventions to safeguard their well-being. During
the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been limited
research specifically focusing on the psychological
effects, including anxiety, depression, and fear,
experienced by Iraqi nurses working in isolated
units and centers for COVID-19 patients. Most
available studies have primarily focused on
epidemiological, clinical aspects of the disease
and global health control challenges. The study
aims to determine the levels of anxiety, depression, and fear among nurses during the COVID-19
pandemic.
Materials and Methods
Design of the study
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted
on nurses working in isolation centers for
COVID-19 Iraq.
Setting of the study
The study was conducted in isolation centers of a
teaching hospital in Baqubah city, Iraq, which is
the city’s primary hospital and has three isolation
centers: Al-shifaa Center, Epidemiological center,
and Dar Al-Diaffa center. These centers are located
in different regions.
Sample of the study
A nonprobability (convenient) sample was used in
our study. The total sample of the study consists of
192 nurses working in Baquba Teaching Hospital,
which includes three centers: Al-Shifa Center,
which contains 58 nurses, the other center, which
is the Dar-Al Diaffa, which contains 51 nurses;
and the Epidemiological Center, which contains
83 nurses the care of COVID patients.
The questionnaire was distributed to 180 nurses.
129 of these nurses completed filling out the
questionnaire. Furthermore, 51 did not complete
filling it out due to the work pressure; some did
not want to complete the questionnaire, while
12 nurses were outside the sample because they
refused to participate. All participants in this study
filled out the questionnaire in Arabic language
after the importance and objectives of the study
were explained to them.
Data collection
The researcher used all international standard
protective precautions during data collection,
including Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
The Arabic version of the reporting questionnaire
with a face-to-face interview technique and online
(e-mail document) were used to collect data from
nurses working in the COVID-19 wards. The
data collection procedure began on April 16th,
2022, until June 29th, 2022. Each nurse spends
approximately (15-20) minutes to complete the
reporting questionnaire.
The study instrument
The tools that were used to collect the data
consisted of four parts:
• A list of common items for assessing the
demographical data of the participant nurses.
• A Patient Health Questionnaire (depression
in providing care for Patients with novel
coronavirus PHQ-9).
• Fear of COVID-19 Scale (fear arising from
caregiving for Patients with coronavirus FCS-
7).
• General Anxiety Disorder scale patients for
nurses in providing care for with the novel
coronavirus (GAD-7).
The research instrument design, including
demographic characteristics selected from
previous studies similar to this study’s variables,
and scales for assessing and evaluating the
psychological status, including (depression,
anxiety and fear) depended on international
standards from previous studies, and the validity
and reliability of all these scales have been done
previously in the Arabic version. I have relied on
them.
Ethical consideration
After taking the measuring tools, a conversation
was conducted with their owner to permit
them to use them, and the answer was that they
were public and available to everyone without
permission. After that, the research proposal was
submitted, and the Institute of Health Sciences at
the University of Cankiri in Turkey approved it.
Then the approval of the Ethics Committee of the
Diyala Health Department in Iraq was obtained
(No:62, Date:11.04.2022) to facilitate the data
collection task in Baquba Teaching Hospital.
Finally, obtaining the consent of the nurses before
participating in filling out the questionnaire by
clarifying the objectives and importance of the
study and emphasizing the preservation of the
privacy of all nurses who participated.
Data analyses
The data were analyzed using basic statistical
methods, including the descriptive statistical
data analysis approach with the Social Sciences
Statistical Package (SPSS) version 23.0. Data
analysis includes the following:
Descriptive statistics: Include Frequency (F),
Percentage (%), Mean score (M), and Standard
Deviation (SD), were used to the assessment of
nurses’ anxiety, depression and fear levels during
COVID-19 and socio-demographic data of them.
Results
Results in Table 1 shows that 78.3 percent of the
study sample were aged from 21 to 30 years old.
In addition, 57.4% of the study samples were
male, and 66.7% were single.
Table 1. Distribution of socio-demographic characteristics of the sample (n=129).
Variable |
No. |
% |
Age Groups |
21-30 |
101 |
78.3 |
31-40 |
21 |
16.3 |
41 years and over |
7 |
5.4 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Gender |
Male |
74 |
57.4 |
Female |
55 |
42.6 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Marital Status |
Married |
38 |
29.5 |
Single |
86 |
66.7 |
Widowed |
1 |
0.8 |
Separated |
4 |
3.1 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Family type |
Big |
57 |
44.2 |
Small |
72 |
55.8 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Education level |
Preparatory in nursing |
11 |
8.5 |
Diploma in nursing |
69 |
35.5 |
Bachelor’s in nursing |
45 |
34.9 |
Higher degree in nursing |
4 |
3.1 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Years of experience in healthcare institutions |
1-5 years |
97 |
75.2 |
6-10 years |
22 |
17.1 |
11-15 years |
7 |
5.4 |
16 years and over |
3 |
2.3 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Sharing in training sessions concerning pandemic isolation units previous work in pandemic isolation units |
Yes |
69 |
53.5 |
No |
60 |
46.5 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Yes |
81 |
62.8 |
No |
48 |
37.2 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Source of information about Pandemic Isolation units |
Television |
11 |
8.5 |
Internet |
69 |
53.5 |
Other sources |
49 |
38 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Duration of work in pandemic isolation units |
4 weeks or less |
66 |
51.2 |
More than 4 weeks |
63 |
48.8 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
Duration of official daily work |
7 hours |
52 |
40.3 |
More than 7 hours |
77 |
59.7 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Previous infection by COVID 19 |
Yes |
64 |
49.6 |
No |
65 |
50.4 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Number of infection by COVID 19 |
One time |
40 |
31 |
Two times |
24 |
18.6 |
No |
65 |
50.4 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
History of psychiatric disease |
Yes |
7 |
5.4 |
No |
122 |
94.6 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Do you use: |
Alcohol beverage |
9 |
7 |
Drugs |
9 |
7 |
Smoking |
39 |
30.2 |
No |
72 |
55.8 |
Total |
129 |
100 |
Regarding family type, 55.8% of the study sample
was within a small family type. Moreover, 53.5%
of the study samples have a diploma in nursing,
and 34.9% have a bachelor’s degree in nursing.
In addition, 75.2% of the study samples have 1-5
years of experience in healthcare settings, in which
53.5% of them were sharing training sessions
related to pandemic isolation units, and 62.8%
of the study samples have previously worked in
pandemic isolation units.
Additionally 53.5% of the study sample learned
about pandemic isolation units online. Also,
51.2% of the study samples have four weeks or
less of work in isolation units. Related to previous
infection by COVID-19, this disease infected
49.6% of the study sample, and 31% of the study
sample had a one-time infection by COVID-19.
94.6% of the study sample did not have a history
of psychiatric diseases. Most of the study sample
(55.8%) did not use alcohol, drugs, or smoking,
while 30.2% were smokers.
Table 2 shows that 32.6% of the nurses had minimal
depression, and 37.2% had mild depression.
17.8% of nurses had moderate depression. While
only 7% had moderately severe depression and
5.4% had severe depression.
Table 2. Frequency and relative distributions of the nurses according to their level of depression.
Percentage |
Number of Nurses |
Depression scores |
Depression level |
32.60% |
42 |
0-4 |
Minimal |
37.20% |
48 |
9-May |
Mild |
17.80% |
23 |
14-Oct |
Moderate |
7% |
9 |
15-19 |
Moderately severe |
5.40% |
7 |
20-27 |
Severe |
100% |
129 |
- |
Total |
Table 3 shows that 46.5% of nurses had a minimal
level of fear, followed by 31.8% with mild fear,
14% with moderate fear, and 7.8% of nurses had
severe fear.
Table 3. Frequency and relative distributions of the nurses according to their level of fear.
Fear level |
Fear scores |
Number of Nurses |
Percentage |
Minimal |
13-Jul |
60 |
46.50% |
Mild |
14-20 |
41 |
31.80% |
Moderate |
21-27 |
18 |
14% |
Severe |
28-35 |
10 |
7.80% |
Total |
- |
129 |
100% |
Table 4 shows that 40.3% and 35.7% of nurses had
minimal and mild anxiety, respectively. 16.3% had
moderate anxiety, and 7.8% of nurses had severe
anxiety.
Table 4. Frequency and relative distributions of the nurses according to their level of Anxiety.
Anxiety level |
Anxiety scores |
Number of Nurses |
Percentage |
Minimal |
0-4 |
52 |
40.30% |
Mild |
9-May |
46 |
35.70% |
Moderate |
14-Oct |
21 |
16.30% |
Severe |
15-21 |
10 |
7.80% |
Total |
- |
129 |
100% |
Discussion
Results of the present study revealed that 78.3% of
the study samples were aged from 21 to 30 years
old. (2020) research showed that most of the study
sample (39%) was in the age range of 31-40 years.
Regarding the age distribution of the study sample,
the current study and the study conducted by Al-
Hamoodi, Hadi, and Al Asadi are comparable [7].
However, the age distribution of the research
sample in the current investigation differs from
that in the studies by Farrukh et al., and Lu et
al. [8,9]. In contrast to Lu et al., study, which
revealed the highest percentage to be between the
ages of 31 and 40, the majority of participants in
the current study are between the ages of 21 and
30. Comparably, Farrukh et al., study revealed that 39% of the study sample’s participants were
between 31 and 40.
The gender distribution of the study sample is
identical in the present study to the study by Al-
Hamoodi, Hadi, and Al Asadi.
A sizable component of the study sample in the
current study and in the studies by Mohammed
and Bakey and Al-Hamoodi, Hadi, and Al Asadi
belonged to small family types the current study,
along with those by Li, et al., Farrukh et al., and
Mohammed and Bakey, provides data on the
experience levels of nurses in healthcare settings
[7,8,10,11]. All three studies-this one, Mohammed
and Bakey, Farrukh et al., and this one-reported
a sizable proportion of nurses with 1-5 years of
experience working in healthcare facilities [8,10].
According to the current study and Mohammed
and Bakey, a sizeable portion of nurses relied on
the Internet to learn about COVID-19 or pandemic
isolation units. According to Bhagavathula et al.,
a sizeable percentage of nurses found information
on social media and official government websites.
The study that was presented discovered that a
sizable majority, or 94.6% of the study population
had no history of psychiatric illnesses. Similar
findings were found in Mohammed and Bakey’s
study, which revealed that 96% of nurses had no
history of mental illness. This indicates the overall
mental health of the healthcare professionals
engaged because it reveals that most participants in
both studies did not have pre-existing psychiatric
problems.
Most of the study sample in the current study also
reported not utilizing drugs, alcohol, or tobacco. In
particular, only 42% of nurses in Mohammed and
Bakey’s study reported smoking, compared to 54%
who did not drink alcohol or use drugs. Only 2% of
the population also engaged in substance addiction
and excessive alcohol consumption. These results
imply that by abstaining from alcohol, drugs,
and smoking, a significant proportion of research
participants maintain a healthy lifestyle. Overall,
the findings from both studies show the relatively
low prevalence of psychiatric disorders and the
majority of healthcare professionals’ abstinence
from alcohol, drugs, and smoking. These findings
underline the need to maintain sound mental health
and establish healthy lifestyle habits, which can
improve healthcare professionals’ general wellbeing
and efficiency, particularly in trying times
like the COVID-19 epidemic.
According to the current study’s findings, a
sizable fraction of the study sample had signs
of depression. The majority of participants
about 37.2% were categorized as having mild
depression, while only 5.4% showed signs of
severe depression. The study by Faisal et al.,
found that 40% of the individuals had moderate
to severe anxiety, 72% had depressive symptoms,
and 53% had moderate to poor mental health
conditions [12]. These findings are comparable
with their findings. These findings highlight the
high frequency of mental health issues, such as
depression, among healthcare professionals. The
interpretation of the results should consider the
potential influence of various factors on healthcare
workers’ mental health, such as the availability
of support systems, working conditions, and
individual coping mechanisms.
Result in this study declared that 35.7% of the
study samples have mild anxiety and less than
10% have severe anxiety. In a comparison, Cai
also reported that approximately 61% of nurses
in China have minimal level of anxiety during
pandemic of COVID-19 [13]. In contrast, Hu
et al., declared that 58.6% of nurses in regional
healthcare settings in China had no anxiety
during pandemic of COVID-19. The prevalence
of anxiety among nurses during the COVID-19
pandemic can be multifactorial. Several factors
may contribute to the varying levels of anxiety
observed in different research studies. Such as
work environment: The work environment plays
a significant role in determining the level of
anxiety experienced by nurses. Factors such as the
availability and adequacy of Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE), staffing levels, and workload
can influence anxiety levels. In settings where
there is a shortage of PPE or high patient-tonurse
ratios, nurses may experience heightened
anxiety. Access to information: The availability
and quality of information about the pandemic can
impact anxiety levels.
This study presented that about third of the study
sample have mild fear and 7.8% have severe fear.
In contrast, Alnazl et al., reported that more than
half of nurses had a moderate level of fear in Jordan
and similarly Hu et al., reported moderate to high
level of fear among nurses [5,14]. The spread of
fear among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic
can be attributed to various reasons. Some factors
that contribute to the spread of fear, along with
the potential reasons for the different levels of
fear reported in different studies: uncertainty and novelty of the virus: The emergence of a new and
unknown virus like the coronavirus can generate
fear and anxiety.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated the prelevance of mild
anxiety, mild depression and minimal fear
among nurses working in isolation centers for
COVID-19 patients in Iraq. Our study suggests
conduct of more research studies that focus
on the psychological aspect of nurses in Iraq.
These studies should involve larger numbers of
participants and cover multiple regions to ensure
the generalizability of the results. Provide nurses
with training and education about managing stress,
coping mechanisms, and self-care strategies.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of our study regarding to the
prevalence of mild anxiety, mild depression, and
minimal fear among nurses working in isolation
centers for COVID-19 patients in Iraq can be
made:
• Increasing Research Studies: Encourage and
support the conduct of more research studies
that focus on the psychological aspect of
nurses in Iraq. These studies should involve
larger numbers of participants and cover
multiple regions to ensure the generalizability
of the results.
• Mental Health Support for Nurses: Given the
prevalence of anxiety, depression, and fear
among nurses during the COVID-19 period,
it is crucial to prioritize mental health support
for nurses in Iraq. Healthcare organizations
should develop and implement programs that
promote mental well-being, reduce stress, and
provide psychological support for nurses on
the frontline.
• Training and Education: Provide nurses with
training and education about managing stress,
coping mechanisms, and self-care strategies.
Equipping nurses with the knowledge and
skills to handle the psychological impact of
the pandemic can help them better manage
their mental health and provide optimal patient
care.
• Developing Comprehensive Crisis Management
Plans: The Ministry of Health in Iraq should develop scientific and moral plans for
managing the COVID-19 crisis. These plans
should include strategies to encourage nurses
to work under pressure and challenges while
maintaining their psychological well-being.
It is important to consider practical and
emotional support for nurses during crises.
• Educating the Community: The Ministry of
Health should develop plans to educate the
general community about the COVID-19
crisis and the sacrifices made by nursing staff
in Iraq. This education can help reduce the
pressure and misconceptions surrounding the
work environment, leading to better support
and understanding from the population.
• Supportive Leadership and Positive Work
Environment: Increase support for nursing
staff from leaders and managers within the
healthcare system. This includes creating
a positive work environment that supports
nurses’ well-being and provides them with the
necessary resources and recognition. Effective
leadership and support can contribute to
maintaining psychological peace for nurses.
• Collaborating with Mental Health
Professionals: Collaborate with mental health
professionals, psychologists, or psychiatrists
to offer counseling services and establish
referral systems for nurses who require more
specialized support. This multidisciplinary
approach can ensure comprehensive care for
nurses’ mental health needs.
• Implementing these recommendations can
contribute to better support for nurses in Iraq,
enhance their psychological well-being, and
improve the overall quality of care during
crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Acknowledgement
First and foremost, I express my gratitude to Allah,
whose kindness, mercy, and benevolence enabled
me to complete this thesis. I also extend my sincere
thanks and appreciation to my supervisor. I want
to thank all the faculty members at the Institute
of Health Sciences at Jankiri University and my
colleagues, who provided me with assistance and
guidance throughout the research process. I am
especially grateful to my beloved and supportive
family, particularly my mother and father, who
deserve the utmost credit and gratitude. Their unwavering support, help, and guidance have
been instrumental in my journey during the study
period.
References
- Aknin LB, Andretti B, Goldszmidt R, Helliwell JF, Petherick A, et al. Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(5):e417-e426.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Alhilfi RA, Majeed YY, Banoosh AK, Ali SS, Shnan AB, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Iraq, three months situation analysis. Iraqi N Med J. 2020;6(12):1.
[Google Scholar]
- Morgado-Toscano C, Gomez-Salgado J, García-Iglesias JJ, Fagundo-Rivera J, López-López D, et al. Levels of anxiety and fear among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. J Nurs Manag. 2023;2023.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
- Burstyn I, Holt K. A cross-sectional survey of the workplace factors contributing to symptoms of anxiety and depression among nurses and physicians during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in two US healthcare systems. Ann Work Expo Health. 2022;66(3):312-333.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hu D, Kong Y, Li W, Han Q, Zhang X, et al. Frontline nurses’ burnout, anxiety, depression, and fear statuses and their associated factors during the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China: A large-scale cross-sectional study. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;24:100424.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Sampaio F, Sequeira C, Teixeira L. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on nurse’s mental health: A prospective cohort study. Environ Res. 2021;194:110620.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Al-Hamoodi AA, Hadi B, Al Asadi KM. Psychological Problems among the Health Workers during Pandemic COVID-19. Med Legal Update. 2021;21(1):118-124.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
- Farrukh M, Meng F, Sajid M, Shahzad I. Does strategic fit matter in measuring organizational performance? An empirical analysis. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2020;27(4):1800-1808.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
- Lu W, Wang H, Lin Y, Li L. Psychological status of medical workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Res. 2020;288:112936.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Mohammed DA, Bakey SJ. Psychological status of nurses providing care for patients with COVID-19 at baqubah teaching hospital. Ann Romanian Soc Cell Biol. 2021;25(4):10127-10137.
[Google Scholar]
- Li R, Chen Y, Lv J, Liu L, Zong S, et al. Anxiety and related factors in frontline clinical nurses fighting COVID-19 in Wuhan. Medicine. 2020;99(30):e21413.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Faisal RA, Jobe MC, Ahmed O, Sharker T. Mental health status, anxiety, and depression levels of Bangladeshi university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1500-1515.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cai Q, Feng H, Huang J, Wang M, Wang Q, et al. The mental health of frontline and non-frontline medical workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: A case-control study. J Affect Disord. 2020;275:210-215.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Alnazly E, Khraisat OM, Al-Bashaireh AM, Bryant CL. Anxiety, depression, stress, fear and social support during COVID-19 pandemic among Jordanian healthcare workers. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0247679.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Citation: Determination of Anxiety, Depression Levels and Fears about COVID-19 of Nurses in Iraq ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry,
Vol. 25 (1) January, 2024; 1-8.