![mental health, psychiatry and mental health, journals on mental health, mental health journals, journals mental health](/assets/images/banner_left_01.gif)
![journals for mental health, best journals for mental health, mental health journals uk, journals on psychiatry](/assets/images/banner_left_021.gif)
![journals of psychiatry, psychiatry journals, asean, journal](/assets/images/images_left_01.gif)
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 5268
ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry received 5268 citations as per google scholar report
ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry peer review process verified at publons
Journal Name | ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry (MyCite Report) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Publications | 456 | ||||
Total Citations | 4829 | ||||
Total Non-self Citations | 12 | ||||
Yearly Impact Factor | 0.93 | ||||
5-Year Impact Factor | 1.44 | ||||
Immediacy Index | 0.1 | ||||
Cited Half-life | 2.7 | ||||
H-index | 29 | ||||
Quartile |
|
- Anxiety Disorders
- Behavioural Science
- Biological Psychiatry
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- Community Psychiatry
- Dementia
- Community Psychiatry
- Suicidal Behavior
- Social Psychiatry
- Psychiatry
- Psychiatry Diseases
- Psycho Trauma
- Posttraumatic Stress
- Psychiatric Symptoms
- Psychiatric Treatment
- Neurocognative Disorders (NCDs)
- Depression
- Mental Illness
- Neurological disorder
- Neurology
- Alzheimer's disease
- Parkinson's disease
Abstract
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE MANDARIN TRANSLATION OF BRIEF CORE SCHEMA SCALE (BCSS-C)
Author(s): Renee Tan Huey JingBrief Core Schema Scale (BCSS) is self-rated scale designed to assess perception of patients about themselves and other people. Aim: This is a validation study of the Mandarin translation of Brief Core Schema Scale. Method: The original scale was translated to Mandarin (BCSS-C) via forward and backward translation process. The final product (BCSS-C) was pilot tested on 30 participants. The psychometric properties of BCSS-C was further assessed in a validation study done on clinical (N=226) and non-clinical sample (N=89). Results: The results of the study showed that BCSS-C has good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.96) while also exhibiting good discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the 4 factor model. Conclusion: In conclusion, BCSS-C is reliable and valid.